A reply to Rana Ayyub regarding her rant in Washington post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/11/11/indias-supreme-court-endorses-right-wing-vision-relegating-muslims-second-class-citizens/?fbclid=IwAR1TVac8DaPURstewWNQyXveWRtAreR_ZAVEFVaJhxHoLFFSdRvfJ2aiC_Y#comments-wrapper

I do not know whether WaPo will post it. So I will post it as a blog so that they cannot delete it talking about community standards will not erase it
What else to expect from Rana Ayyub and Washington Post? A rant full of lies and expressed fears substituting Hindus where Muslims would appear if they were in majority and hope to be by fast breeding but will never happen. Before I start on the article people must also know what Madam is. Madam is the author of “Gujarat files”[that’s her ONLY qualification according to WaPo] which is supposed to expose the complicity of BJP, RSS, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Mr Amit Shah and others in an alleged pogrom against the Muslims in 2002 in Gujarat. That’s her claim to rant about anything and everything by any anti-Indian paper like WaPo. What the Supreme Court of India said about that is available at https://www.opindia.com/2019/07/supreme-court-rana-ayyub-gujarat-files-haren-pandya-murder/ and https://www.opindia.com/2019/07/rana-ayyub-gujarat-files/ It said “The Book by Rana Ayyub is of no utility. It is based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value. The opinion of a person is not in the realm of the evidence. There is a likelihood of the same being politically motivated, cannot be ruled out.” So much for her pseudo journalism and WaPo finds only people like her and persons who allegedly pointed out her army’s placement to the enemy so that it can be attacked – deliberately or otherwise, pointed out where innocents [including Americans] are hiding in Hotel Taj so that they can be killed by terrorists, pointed out gaps in the border through which terrorists can infiltrate deliberately or otherwise – are the choice of WaPo. We all know why. I can go line and verse into the quality of ranters selected by WaPo to diss India. But the thick skin without melanin is the defense of WaPo. They think they have the right to abuse anybody and everybody because of the lack of melanin in the skin. Day will dawn for responsible journalism where lies will be called out and editors held responsible. Now on the article the true facts are (a) That during the Muslim invasion of India – more than 60,000 Hindu places of worship were destroyed by the Muslims and made into burial grounds or places of worship for the Muslims. (b) Under Koran those places are of no use and anyone who prays there become non-Muslim and are liable to be killed at sight. So how many Muslims in India are true Muslims? (c) The only Muslim claim to those places were, “we came in murdered and raped the Hindus of and destroyed their places of worship and took over to create abominations. “No law – religious or otherwise support it but we will hold on to insult Hindus and rub salt into the wounds.” (d) As against that Hindus had clear proof of title and possession and unlike the Muslims, at Temple mount, took the legal route to solve the issue. It is not that Hindus cannot adopt the Islamic method. But then, unfortunately for them and fortunately for the Muslims and the Europeans, Indians were too cultured. By the time the Hindus realised that they were not facing civilised human beings they were defeated and supine. (e) The British handed over the power to the servants to loot and destroy India and Indians at last were able to liberate themselves only in 2014. The article is full of SUPPRESSIO VERI and EXPRESSIO FALSI. Let me show a few of them.

 • “The court delivered a huge victory for the nationalist government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. by awarding the land at the heart of the clash to a Hindu litigant over Muslim objections”. The truth is that it was a civil suit for and on behalf of the deity and the government of India, BJP, RSS or in fact any Hindu public is not a party to the suit as against the fact that the representatives of the Muslim community, as a whole, was party to the suit.

 • Only a writer of lies can make such a statement. The land was not given to any Hindu litigant but to the deity as such.

 • Under Indian law the deity in a Temple is a juridical person and a perpetual minor and hence can claim back the property that belongs to it through any next friend who can file a suit on behalf of the deity. The individual claims of other Hindu organisations were negated by the court.

 • The statement of Rana Ayyub “A relative called me ................ breaking into our house.” Makes me laugh. This is exactly what Muslims did in the Bombay riots.  

 • This is very similar to the story of a probably mentally challenged, oversexed frustrated woman who recounted the story of a pregnant woman being cut open alive and the foetus burnt during the 2002 riots started by the Muslims where they claim to be the victims. But, ultimately when evidence was taken in court, it was seen that the fetus was very much inside the lady who was burnt to death in a fire in a housing society. The possibly oversexed madwoman did not dare to give evidence when called for. Every allegation against Hindus regarding the 2002 riots is a lie of the same genre. They are all followers of Hitler whose große Lüge was the foundation of the propaganda. We still have idiots who believe that Hitler’s big lie can be used to fool brown skinned natives.

 • A very short history of what Barbary Masjid is all about is necessary for the Western readers of Washington Post to understand. I will make it as brief as is possible.

 • The Muslims invaded India [just like the Europeans later] in view of the huge wealth that India contained. To give a sample of 700 years of looting by Muslims is estimated at over US$ 200 trillion and 200 years of European looting is estimated that US$ 45 trillion, still India contain 10 times that treasure. It is that treasure that still attracts salivating Muslims and people like Jeremy Corbyn who does not realize that the only country that gave refuge to Jews throughout their Exile and never persecuted them were Indians. He and his like have eyes only on India’s treasures.

 • Among the great temples they destroyed were all the great temples in North India. Many were converted into cemeteries and mosques against the injunctions of Koran.

 • They know that anybody who prays in those places cease to be a Muslim under the Koranic injunctions. Still they do it out of hatred for Hindus whom they could not assimilate and whose culture they could not destroy.

 • Both the Abrahamic religions hate India because even after combined assault on the oldest living civilisation and culture in the world they have not been able to obliterate the same. The assault still continues and will be defeated by an awakened Hindu nation.

 • Rama Janmabhoomi is one of the places where the temple was demolished and an abomination was created calling it a masjid. More than 17 wars were fought to recover the place. Hundreds of thousands sacrificed their lives trying to recover the place. The fight has gone on for 500 years. At last, justice was served by a court of law and it was not in favor of those who demolished the temple and built an abomination in its place. That is the gripe of the likes of Rana.

 • Let Rana show one legal right that the Muslims have over Ayodhya, Kashi, Mathura, Bhojshala and tens of thousands of other temples demolished and converted by the Muslims other than by the might of the sword. They could not, whereas Hindus could show that night and possession over the place legally. Hence the judgement came in favor of the Hindus.

 • The government was not a party to the litigation at all it was a pure civil litigation between the deity and those who appropriated his place of birth.

 • The judiciary dillydallied with the issue so long that the Hindu had to act and it acted.

 • I laugh at the fantastic lie “Our neighbor, ........................ our family.” Nice lie to fool westerners.

 • Rana is copying what happens if the Muslims gain upper hand. We saw it in Iraq in what happened to the Yezidis. We saw it in what happened in 1947. We are seeing it happening even today in Pakistan against Christian and Hindu girls. Here are a few examples

 • https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/sindhs-stolen-brides/229886

 • https://religionnews.com/2019/06/06/forced-conversions-marriages-spike-in-pakistan/

 • just Google it and you will see what she is saying is exactly what Muslims are doing in the areas in their control.

 • If she can show one case of what she said I will withdraw my allegation. As against that I can show that in every riot in India [90% of it are started by Muslims] resulted in the rape of Hindu girls and women. I can produce reams of links. Muslims think it is their right to rape. We have enough cases in which the claims of rapists in Europe Were they thought it was their right to rape.

 • I can give you hundreds of speeches in youtube by Muslim priests saying that they are invaders and masters of Hindus. I challenge Rana to show two speeches of the same nature by Hindus of the same position. I suggest the lady hear those speakers where they say they are Muslims first and Indians never. If the Muslims were abused in Mumbai, they should look at what they do periodically in rioting. Any Friday after Juma prayers Muslims come out and vandalise anything and everything they see in front of them.

 • I suggest you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_riots how is India or Indians connected with the Rakhine riots that took place in Myanmar? Yet the riot was in Bombay. Will Rana explain that? What has The Rakhine riots to do with the unknown soldiers’ Memorial? Why was it vandalised if the Muslim was Indian first and Muslim later?

 • That somebody who is not a party to the suit demolished an abomination does not mean that the illegal occupants of the plot get the right to restitution against the rightful owner who was before the court in a legal manner. Muslims may not respect law but Hindus respect law and it is with the help of law got back What is theirs.

 • Rana speaks about thousand Muslims losing their lives but conveniently forgets facts - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombay_riots - They are the ones who rioted not the Hindus and it was Hindus who were killed and raped.

 • The fear of Rana is based on what the Muslims imposed on Hindus for about 700 years of their abominable genocidal rule. They fear that Hindus will impose on them what they imposed on Hindus. But they forget that Hindus are a cultured people who never went for revenge. I challenge Rana to show otherwise. What is being expressed is the hope of what they can do if and when they get the upper hand.

 • Rana need not talk about Muslim participation in the India’s freedom struggle. The Muslims were always hand in glove with the British and in 1942 back stabbed the freedom movement. As Mr Owaisi said, Muslims who are servants of British and fought for them that is why their names are engraved at the India Gate as Martyers - not of freedom struggle but of fighting for the British.